RCM field guide

Follow the claim, not just the report.

A healthy revenue cycle connects the work before care to the payer response after a claim. This guide outlines the signals we follow and the handoffs we make visible.

The claim journey

Five stages. One connected record.

Each stage should leave the next team with enough context to act, and each exception should have a clear owner.

01
Before care

Registration, eligibility, and authorization

Confirm that the patient, plan, service, provider, and location agree. A 270 eligibility inquiry and 271 response can help establish coverage, but a benefit response does not by itself guarantee payment. Authorization requirements and approved dates need separate attention.

02
Before submission

Charges and claim readiness

Reconcile completed encounters with charges, review documentation status, and clear payer or clearinghouse edits before the 837 claim leaves the practice. A rejected file and a denied adjudicated claim are different problems and belong in different queues.

03
After submission

Acknowledgment and claim status

Track whether a clearinghouse or payer accepted the submission. Where available, a 276 inquiry and 277 response can update the status of a pending claim. A status response tells the team what to do next; it is not the same as a payment.

04
After adjudication

ERA, payment, and remaining balance

The 835 electronic remittance advice explains payment and adjustments. Group codes, CARCs, and RARCs help show why a balance changed. Posting should tie the remit and deposit to the claim before the remaining amount moves to payer or patient follow-up.

05
Resolution

A/R and denial management

Work the open inventory by payer, age, balance, reason, and deadline. A denial packet should include the original claim, payer response, adjustment codes, relevant documentation, owner, and next action. Repeat denials should lead to an upstream fix.

What to measure

Numbers that lead to action.

First-pass acceptance shows whether a submitted claim clears initial edits. Denial rate by reason helps reveal repeatable upstream issues. A/R aging shows where balances are sitting, while no-touch inventory reveals claims that have gone without a recent next action.

Measurements need definitions. A practice should agree on which claims are included, what counts as a touch, and how credits, secondary claims, and patient balances are handled before comparing trends.

How FERO works A/R

Reference points

Know the transaction behind the status.

These CMS resources explain several standard transactions and remittance codes used throughout the cycle.

Start with a conversation

Make the next action on every claim clearer.

Tell us where work gets stuck. We will explore the process, the people involved, and where robot workers can make a useful difference.

Talk with FERO